USPTO serial 76670171
PEEL & REVEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEEL & REVEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Farmingdale, NY
Farmingdale, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Denk
763 S NEW BALLAS RD STE 170SAINT LOUIS, MO 63141-8711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper and plastic strips marketed to manufactures of perfumes and other fragrances that are used for the application of perfume and fragrance samples | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |