USPTO serial 76670665
DONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HUALIEN CITY, HUALIEN COUNTY, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Pelton
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pounded rice cakes, namely, mochi; cakes; candy; coffee; cookies; tea; cakes of sugar-bounded millet or popped rice, namely, okoshi; dried sugared cakes of rice flour, namely, rakugan; pellet-shaped rice crackers, namely, arare; rice cakes; rice crackers, namely, senbei; rice dumplings dressed with sweet bean jam, namely, ankoro; rice pudding; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; soft pin-rolled cakes of pounded rice, namely, gyuhi; sweet pounded rice cakes, namely, mochi-gashi; bars of sweet jellied bean paste, namely, yohkan | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |