USPTO serial 76670865
SAFE T JACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3795891Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 2010
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAFE T JACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lifting Systems Technology, Inc.
Balboa, CA
Lifting Systems Technology, Inc.
Balboa, CA
Lifting Systems Technology, Inc.
Balboa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER C. TURNER
ROGER C. TURNER LAW OFFICE OF ROGER C. TURNER280 Cagney Lane, suite 306NEWPORT BEACH, CA, CA 92663-1620UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER OPERATED JACK SYSTEM COMPOSED OF A MECHANICAL JACK STAND, AND A SEPARATE POWER UNIT THAT IS REMOVABLY ATTACHED THERETO ONLY WHEN RAISING AND LOWERING THE JACK STAND | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lifting Systems Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lifting Systems Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lifting Systems Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SAFE T JACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |