USPTO serial 76671542
FLAVOR EXPRESSIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLAVOR EXPRESSIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
International Flavors and Fragrances, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by International Flavors and Fragrances, Inc.
International Flavors and Fragrances, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by International Flavors and Fragrances, Inc.
Nottingham Spirk Design Associates
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Nottingham Spirk Design Associates
Nottingham Spirk Design Associates
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Nottingham Spirk Design Associates
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Gugliotta
John D. Gugliotta Patent, Copyright & Trademark Law Group, LLC3792 Cascade Oaks TrailSuite 200Richfield, OH 44286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Aromatic impregnated strips to be placed into food storage containers for infusing flavor into the stored food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Flavors and Fragrances, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by International Flavors and Fragrances, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nottingham Spirk Design Associates
- Other trademarks owned by Nottingham Spirk Design Associates
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FLAVOR EXPRESSIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |