USPTO serial 76671966
BIAGIO'S CLASSICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIAGIO'S CLASSICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
East Haven, CT
East Haven, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony P. DeLio
ANTHONY P. DELIO DeLio & Peterson, LLC121 WHITNEY AVENUE3RD FLOORNEW HAVEN, CT 06510-1242Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FOOD PRODUCTS NAMELY PASTA AND SAUCES; BAKED GOODS, NAMELY BREADS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |