USPTO serial 76672105
HAIRMED ADVANCED HAIR NUTRIENTS SHAMPOO THINNING/BALDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 622
- Filing date
- —
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- UNKNOWN
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAIRMED ADVANCED HAIR NUTRIENTS SHAMPOO THINNING/BALDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetic preparations for healthy looking hair and body for men, women and veteinary | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2005 |
| 005 | therapeutic hair and total body health for men and women | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2005 |
| 008 | hand operated tools for use on hair and body for health and beauty | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIEDMAN, RITA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named HAIRMED ADVANCED HAIR NUTRIENTS SHAMPOO THINNING/BALDING
- Prosecution event CNRT explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |