USPTO serial 76672523
FIBEROD SUCKEROD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIBEROD SUCKEROD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert V. Jambor
Robert V. Jambor Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.Two Prudential Plaza, Suite 4900Chicago, IL 60101-6731UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, fiberglass sucker rods and fiberglass sucker rod end-fittings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiberod, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Fiber Composite Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Fiber Composite Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named FIBEROD SUCKEROD
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |