Drawing for WIREIZER

USPTO serial 76672766

WIREIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIREIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony P. DeLio

ANTHONY P. DELIO DeLIO & PETERSON121 Whitney AvenueNew Haven, CT 06510-1241UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mechanical adapter connectors for electronic and audio equipment, and cablesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 22, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 9, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 9, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 27, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance