Drawing for MARIE SHARP'S PROUD PRODUCTS OF BELIZE

USPTO serial 76672823

MARIE SHARP'S PROUD PRODUCTS OF BELIZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARIE SHARP'S PROUD PRODUCTS OF BELIZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030PEPPER SAUCE IN WHOLE OR IN SUBSTANTIAL PART FROM BELIZEACTIVESep 18, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Dec 19, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Dec 18, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 11, 2007LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Dec 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance