USPTO serial 76673037
NATIONAL CONSORTIUM OF BREAST CENTERS FOUNDED 1986
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATIONAL CONSORTIUM OF BREAST CENTERS FOUNDED 1986?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven L. Smilay
Steven L. Smilay Botkin & Hall, LLP105 E. Jefferson BoulevardSuite 400South Bend, IN 46601-1913Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | This represents an organization that promotes excellence in breast health care for the general public through a network of diverse professionals dedicated to the active exchange of ideas and resources including; 1; to serve as an information resource and to provide support services to those rendering care to people with breast diseases through educational programs, newsletters, a national directory and patient forums 2; To encourage professionals to concentrate and specialize in activities related to breast disease 3; To encourage the development of programs and centers that address breast disease and promote breast health 4; To facilitate collaborative research opportunities on issues of breast health 5; To develop a set of core measures to define, improve and sustain quality standards in comprehensive breast programs and centers; The corporation is operated exclusively as an educational, scientific and charitable organization within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code | ACTIVE | Dec 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |