Drawing for INNOVATION IN MOTION

USPTO serial 76674146

INNOVATION IN MOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INNOVATION IN MOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Smith, Jr.

GEORGE A. SMITH, JR. Howson and Howson LLP501 OFFICE CENTER DR STE 210FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034-3224UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007chains, cable drag chains, belts, sprockets, gears, pulleys, couplings clutches and torque limiters, all for power transmission in industrial machines; conveyors, carrousels and sorters, all for handling materials; electric motors; speed reducers for electric motors; continuously variable speed changers; electrically powered linear actuators; pneumatic actuators; industrial robots; index drives and shock absorbers; all for use in industrial machinesACTIVE
009electronic speed controls for motors, automatic electronic controls for industrial machinery , electronic safety controls for electric motors and engines; and electronic signal transmission equipment for use with industrial machineryACTIVE
012timing belts and chains, tensioners therefor, pulleys, guides, levers, timing drive system, and power transmission chains, all for land vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 27, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance