USPTO serial 76674316
IN EAR SOUND EXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN EAR SOUND EXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George D. Dickos
GEORGE D. DICKOS KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES535 SMITHFIELD ST., HENRY W. OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ear phones, namely, ear molds for use with sound amplifiers, namely, amplifiers for the music industry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |