Drawing for CRANDALTON

USPTO serial 76674722

CRANDALTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRANDALTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Spatz

WILLIAM J. SPATZ Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP1177 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Real estate marketing services in the field of condominiums, apartments and homes, and real estate sales management servicesACTIVE
036Real estate brokerage and management services, and real estate planning services, namely, strategic planning and implementation related to real estate procurement and disposition for others; real estate acquisition servicesACTIVE
037Real estate planning and development services for commercial, recreational and residential land uses; real estate construction, construction supervision and repair servicesACTIVE
041recreation services in the nature of providing horseback riding, swimming, tennis court and golf course facilities, and entertainment services in the nature of tennis and golf tournamentsACTIVE
043resort hotel services, restaurant services, catering services, providing bar facilities and meeting room facilitiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 17, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 29, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 24, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance