USPTO serial 76674729
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
South San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles S. Cotropia
CHARLES S. COTROPIA Sidley Austin, LLP717 North Harwood, Suite 3400Dallas, TX 75201-6538UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promotion and marketing services, namely promoting the interests of milk producers through commercial advertisements promoting milk and milk products in the form of television, radio, print and electronic media, marketing programs involving distribution of promotional materials; business consulting services related to milk producers; distribution of printed advertising materials | ACTIVE | Oct 16, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |