USPTO serial 76675026
24/7 PMO VALVE NON-STOP PRODUCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3639996Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 24/7 PMO VALVE NON-STOP PRODUCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda H. Wilcox
Amanda H. Wilcox Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP200 Public SquareSuite 3500Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Valves of metal that are not parts of machines; shut-off, bypass and mixing valves of metal that are not parts of machines, for liquids, fluids or gases; mixing proof valves of metal that are not parts of machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 11, 2007 |
| 007 | Mechanically operated valves being parts of machines; Valve housings and other essential valve components, namely, valve seats and valve elements that cooperate with one another to control fluid flow and packings that prevent leakage, all of the foregoing being machine parts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 11, 2007 |
| 009 | Controlling equipment and apparatus, namely, automatic valves, and monitoring, controlling, regulating and communicating devices and apparatus for valves, namely, electric valve actuators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 11, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEA TUCHENHAGEN GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Tuchenhagen GmbH.
- Other trademarks owned by Tuchenhagen GmbH.
- Other trademarks owned by Tuchenhagen GmbH.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named 24/7 PMO VALVE NON-STOP PRODUCTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |