Drawing for HOYALUX ID WORKSTYLE

USPTO serial 76675042

HOYALUX ID WORKSTYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOYALUX ID WORKSTYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grady K. Bergen

Grady K. Bergen Griggs Bergen LLP3131 McKinney Ave.Suite 600Dallas, TX 75204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SPECTACLE LENSES; SPECTACLE LENS BLANKS; SPECTACLES; SPECTACLE FRAMES; SPECTACLE CASES; SUNGLASSES; CONTACT LENSES; CONTAINERS FOR CONTACT LENSES; SKI GOGGLESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 12, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 26, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Feb 14, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 10, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jul 13, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 8, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 5, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 14, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 19, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2009UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED
Feb 3, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 4, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED
Mar 18, 2008RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED
Mar 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance