USPTO serial 76675210
FOR DARFUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOR DARFUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Delray Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Mark Greenbaum
LESLIE MARK GREENBAUM Gross, Shuman, Brizdle & Gilfillan, P.C.465 MAIN ST STE 600BUFFALO, NY 14203-1787UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services,namely, to conduct programs and provide information in schools, at public events, and on-line, concerning the ongoing conflict and humanitarian crisis in the Darfur region of Sudan | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Charitable services, namely, to provide humanitarian relief and aid to persons effected by armed conflict, epidemics and natural or man-made disasters, including but not limited to, the ongoing conflict in the Darfur region of Sudan | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |