CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LFI'S MOST INNOVATIVE PRODUCT OF THE YEAR

USPTO serial 76675358

LFI'S MOST INNOVATIVE PRODUCT OF THE YEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LFI'S MOST INNOVATIVE PRODUCT OF THE YEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Brewster

WILLIAM H. BREWSTER Kilpatrick Stockton LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Services in the nature of a contest resulting in awards being distributed in recognition of distinguished achievement or design in the lighting industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance