USPTO serial 76675645
PYCCKNN CTAHDAPT ST. PETERSBURG VODKA 1894
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PYCCKNN CTAHDAPT ST. PETERSBURG VODKA 1894?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huenenberg, CH
Hamilton HM 12, BM
Hamilton HM 12, BM
Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
Huenenberg, CH
Other trademarks owned by Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maxim A. Voltchenko
Maxim A. Voltchenko Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP90 Matawan Road, Suite 201Matawan, NJ 07747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka | ACTIVE | Sep 19, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roust Trading Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Roust Trading Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Roust Trading Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named PYCCKNN CTAHDAPT ST. PETERSBURG VODKA 1894
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |