USPTO serial 76675681
GYPSY COWGIRL COLLECTION JUSTIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GYPSY COWGIRL COLLECTION JUSTIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles S. Cotropia
Charles S. Cotropia Sidley Austin, LLP717 North Harwood, Suite 3400Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear, namely, western boots for women | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |