Drawing for TIN-COMMAND-MAN

USPTO serial 76675686

TIN-COMMAND-MAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIN-COMMAND-MAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Matos

PETER A. MATOS MALLOY & MALLOY, P.A.2800 S.W. 3rd Avenue, Historic Coral WayMiami, FL 33129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Party supplies, namely, stationery, pencils, paper napkins, paper party hats, and paper bannersACTIVE
020Party supplies, namely, plastic bannersACTIVE
021Party supplies, namely, paper plates and cupsACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, jackets, pants, dresses, shoes, and socksACTIVE
028Party supplies, namely, balloons; inflatable toys, namely, a moon bounce in the shape of a houseACTIVE
041Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a fictional character/personalityACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 4, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 4, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 4, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance