USPTO serial 76675846
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter L. Costas
PETER L COSTAS PEPE & HAZARD LLP225 ASYLUM STREETFL 20HARTFORD, CT 06103-1507| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENT FOR REPORTING GLOBAL POSITIONING OF VEHICLES AND VESSELS, NAMELY, MOBILE RADIO TRANSMITTERS, ELECTRIC LUMINESCENT DISPLAY PANELS, ANTENNAS, MOUNTS FOR GLOBAL POSITIONING DEVICES, ELECTRIC CABLES AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |