Drawing for WATCHDOG

USPTO serial 76675846

WATCHDOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATCHDOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter L. Costas

PETER L COSTAS PEPE & HAZARD LLP225 ASYLUM STREETFL 20HARTFORD, CT 06103-1507

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENT FOR REPORTING GLOBAL POSITIONING OF VEHICLES AND VESSELS, NAMELY, MOBILE RADIO TRANSMITTERS, ELECTRIC LUMINESCENT DISPLAY PANELS, ANTENNAS, MOUNTS FOR GLOBAL POSITIONING DEVICES, ELECTRIC CABLES AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SOFTWAREACTIVEMar 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 9, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 12, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 25, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance