Drawing for DELAMO

USPTO serial 76675935

DELAMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELAMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

THOMAS I. ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVD STE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020DISPENSERS FOR BATHROOM PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FIXED PLASTIC TOWEL DISPENSERS; NON-METAL MOP HANDLES, PLASTIC HANDLES IN THE NATURE OF POLE FITTINGS FOR USE WITH LOBBY DUSTPANS, BROOMS, MOPS, AND SKI POLESACTIVE
021DISPENSERS FOR BATHROOM PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DISPENSERS MADE OF PLASTIC FOR DISPENSING TOWELS, TISSUES, HAND WIPES AND TAMPONS; CONSUMER AND INDUSTRIAL CLEANING HARDWARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SOAP DISPENSERS, METAL AND PLASTIC TOILET TISSUE DISPENSERS, TOILET SEAT COVER DISPENSERS, SANITARY NAPKIN WASTE RECEPTACLES, AND METAL AND PLASTIC DUSTPANS, URINAL DEODORANT BLOCK HOLDER, SPONGE MOPS, YARN MOPS, DUST MOPS, MOP STICKS, FLOOR WAX APPLICATOR MOUNTABLE ON A MOP HANDLE, FLOOR BRUSHES, BATH BRUSHES, SCOURING PAD HOLDERS; MOPS, MOP WRINGERS, MOP SPONGES AND SPONGE REFILLS FOR ROLLER MOPS; PLASTIC AND METAL BUCKETS; PLASTIC AND METAL BUCKETS WITH MOP WRINGERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 30, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance