USPTO serial 76676945
ONETOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONETOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis L. Harrington
CURTIS L. HARRINGTON Harrington & Harrington6300 E STATE UNIVERSITY DR STE 250LONG BEACH, CA 90815-4673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric can openers, electric coffee grinders, electric jar openers, electric spice grinders, electric egg beaters, electric food blenders, electric food choppers, electric household food grinders, electric food processors, electric food slicers, electric fruit peelers, electric glue guns and applicator tips, electric hammers, electric juice extractors and juicers, electric knife sharpeners, electric knives, electric meat grinders, electric household pasta makers, electric sausage stuffers, electric scissors, electric vegetable peelers, electrically operated brushes, engraving machines, vacuum pads for vacuum pump machines, vacuum pumps, vacuum packaging machines, electric mills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |