USPTO serial 76677035
IN YOUR ELEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN YOUR ELEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jo M. Fairbairn
JO M. FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGE, P.A.THE KINNEY & LANGE BUILDING312 SOUTH THIRD STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOME ELEMENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HOME ELEMENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Pin Jang Enterprise Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named IN YOUR ELEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |