USPTO serial 76677111
THE BRIGO CONSULTING HAUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BRIGO CONSULTING HAUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sigrid Cobet-Nüse
Gonnermann, Britta e/o Gil Price3513 S LESCHI PLSEATTLE, WA 98144-2622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services relating to human resource management, especially with regard to internationalization processes; business management consultancy, especially with regard to internationalization processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting seminars and workshops in the field of cross-cultural team-building; Coaching services in the field of cross-cultural teambuilding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |