USPTO serial 76677135
TELEFLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELEFLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. O'Connell, Jr.
Robert M. O'Connell, Jr. Goodwin Procter, LLPExchange Place53 State StreetBoston, MA 02109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic messaging services, namely, providing transfer and forwarding electronic information and documents from sender electronic devices to recipient electronic devices over an information exchange network; providing multiple user access to network portals for transfer and forwarding electronic information and documents over an information exchange network; providing electronic messaging, namely collecting electronic messages from senders and transferring and forwarding to an information exchange network maintained by others for subsequent delivery to intended recipients; hardware and computer software enabling transfer and delivery of electronic information and documents between electronic devices; providing consultation, development and management of computer software and/or hardware applications and tools to enable transfer and forwarding of electronic information and documents between electronic devices over an information exchange network; licensing others to incorporate the capability and functionality to enable transfer and forwarding of electronic information and documents between electronic devices over an information exchange network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |