USPTO serial 76677197
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Oisher
200 HIGH POINT DR STE PH-2HARTSDALE, NY 10530-1139UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices for the performance of electrosurgical procedures involving the use of radio-frequency energy and accessories therefor in the nature of electrosurgical electrodes and electrosurgical handpieces | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |