USPTO serial 76677309
REYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3718914Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2009
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. BARTZ
RICHARD J. BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ, P.A.SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTRE6750 FRANCE AVE S STE 350EDINA, MN 55435Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MOTOR HOMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 4, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |