Drawing for LA MUSICA.COM ENTERTAINMENT

USPTO serial 76677352

LA MUSICA.COM ENTERTAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA MUSICA.COM ENTERTAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Rynkiewicz

JOHN P. RYNKIEWICZ KAYE SCHOLER LLP901 15TH ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2329

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded CD featuring music and comedyACTIVE
035Promoting live music shows for others; promoting for others radio and television programs featuring music shows, game shows, news shows, talent contests, award shows, fashion shows, dance and television programs featuring music shows, game shows, news shows, talent contests, award shows, fashion shows, dance shows, dramatic and comedic shows, and sports events for others; promoting the concerts of others; dissemination of advertising for others via InternetACTIVE
038Streaming of video material on the InternetACTIVE
041Distribution of television programming via the Internet; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances and musical, variety, news and comedy showsACTIVE
042Hosting of digital music, video and entertainment content on the InternetACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FAXXFAX SENT
Mar 28, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 28, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 5, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance