USPTO serial 76677444
FLAPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DICHTUNGSTECHNIK G. BRUSS GmbH & CO. KG
22955 Hoisdorf/Hamburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by DICHTUNGSTECHNIK G. BRUSS GmbH & CO. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Kupersmith Larkin
JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN Seyfarth Shaw LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3300One Century PlazaLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | OIL SEPARATOR FOR COMBUSTION ENGINES AND GEARINGS; OIL SEPARATOR INTEGRATED INTO VALVE HOODS OF COMBUSTION ENGINES; OIL SEPARATOR WITH CHANGEABLE CROSS SECTIONS FOR COMBUSTION ENGINES AND GEARINGS; GASKETS FOR VALVE HOODS AND OIL PANS OF COMBUSTION ENGINES AND GEARINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |