USPTO serial 76677543
KIDEA KIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIDEA KIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas S. Baker, Jr
THOMAS S. BAKER, JR THOMAS S. BAKER, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW1371 WEST 3RD AVENUECOLUMBUS, OH 43212-2900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | PREFABRICATED BUILDINGS OF METAL; BUILDING MATERIALS OF METAL, NAMELY, SOFTITS, COMPOSITE PANELS, BUILDING BOARDS, NON-ELECTRIC CABLES, DUCTS FOR CENTRAL HEATING INSTALLATIONS AND FOR VENTILATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING INSTALLATIONS, DOOR FRAMES, FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING, GIRDERS, HINGES, JOISTS, LATHS, LATTICEWORK, LININGS, PARTITIONS, PIPEWORK, REINFORCING MATERIALS FOR BUILDING, FOR CONCRETE AND FOR PIPES, ROOFS COVERINGS, SCAFFOLDING, SHEETS AND PLATES, SHUTTERS, TUBES, WAINSCOTING, WATER PIPES,WINDOW FRAMES; FITTINGS OF METAL FOR FURNITURE, NAMELY, CONNECTING BOLTS, HINGES, NAILS, FITTINGS FOR BEDS, FURNITURE CASTERS, HOOKS, KNOBS, NUTS, PEGS, RINGS, RIVETS, SCREWS, STOPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | FURNITURE RACKS, NAMELY, COAT AND SHOE RACKS, BOTTLE RACKS, KEYS RACKS, TOOLS RACKS, FOOD RACKS, TOILS RACKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | BUILDING GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |