USPTO serial 76678203
NOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.
EDWARD D. LANQUIST, JR. Waddey & Patterson, P.C.1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203-2774UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services in the field of energy efficiency related to lighting; consulting services in the field of energy use management related to lighting; consulting services in the field of energy efficiency; consulting services in the field of energy use management | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of lighting equipment; installation and maintenance of indoor and outdoor lighting; and related consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named NOVATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EARE | EARLY EXTENSION OF USE REFUSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |