USPTO serial 76678320
EASY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I. ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVD STE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S AND BOY'S WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TANK TOPS, WOVEN SHIRTS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, VESTS, JACKETS, PANTS, SWEATPANTS, JEANS, SHORTS, HATS, CAPS, COATS, SCARVES, NECKERCHIEFS, NECK BANDS, WRIST BANDS, HEAD BANDS, GLOVES, BELTS WORN WITH CLOTHING, PAJAMAS, SHOES, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, SWIM WEAR, AND TRUNKS; AND WOMEN'S AND GIRL'S WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TANK TOPS, WOVEN SHIRTS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, VESTS, JACKETS, PANTS, SWEATPANTS, JEANS, SHORTS, HATS, CAPS, COATS, BELTS WORN WITH CLOTHING, SCARVES, NECKERCHIEFS, NECK BANDS, WRIST BANDS, HEAD BANDS, GLOVES, PAJAMAS, SHOES, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, FOUNDATIONS, PANTYHOSE, TEDDIES, BRAS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, BLOUSES, SWIM WEAR, AND BIKINIS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |