USPTO serial 76678477
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen Cooney-Porter
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable newsletters in the field exercise and sport psychology | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed newsletters in the field of exercise and sport psychology | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests of professionals and patients in the field of psychology through the application of psychological knowledge to field of exercise and sport psychology, promoting the goods and services of others, namely, membership services through publication advertisements | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing online list servers for dissemination of messages among computer users concerning meetings, funding opportunities, research, practice and policy relating to the field of exercise and sport psychology | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational workshops in the area of exercise and sports psychology; entertainment in the nature of a running race | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |