USPTO serial 76678966
URBAN VERMIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URBAN VERMIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon S. Lazarovitz
31 Westgate Blvd.Toronto, Ontario, M3H 1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, games, playthings, and sporting goods, namely, basketball backboards, toy scooters, skateboards and skateboard bag, bendable play figures and accessories therefor, toy action figures and accessories therefor, sports board games, balls, namely, basketballs, playground balls, sport balls, foam action balls and toy hoop sets, toy banks, toy watches, bath tub toys, children's multiple activity toys, toy magic tricks sets, water squirting toys, wind-up toys, jump ropes, sling shots, audio and visual toys, namely, toy walkie-talkies, talking dolls, toy 3-D viewers and reels, boards games, card games, hand held units for playing electronic games, stand alone video game machines and programs therefor sold as a unit, electronic game equipment with a watch function, hand held LCD game machines in the nature of hand-held games with liquid crystal displays, coin and non-coin operated game tables, pinball machines and pinball-type games, jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles; mechanical action toys, battery-operated action toys, puppets; dolls, playsets for dolls, doll clothing and doll costumes, children's play cosmetics; role playing games, action-type target shooting game sets comprising toy gun, toy suction darts and target, toy weapons, watering squirting toy guns, kites, paper and plastic party favors in the nature of small toys and noisemakers, balloons, stuffed and plush toys, latex squeeze toy figures, musical toys, inflatable bath toys, swimming and inflatable ride-in toys, toy vehicles, ride-in toys, inflatable play floatation devices in the nature of floating recreational lounge chairs, body boards and leashes therefor for recreational use; toy sand boxes and sand toys, snow sleds, toboggans, snow saucers and snow boards for recreational use, toy building blocks; mobiles for children, Christmas tree ornaments, toy craft kits comprising molds and molding compound for making toy figures; plastic action figure models, flying discs, pet toys, marbles and yo-yos; Playing cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |