USPTO serial 76678977
ECO FLEECE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO FLEECE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Commerce, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY F. GITLIN
LARRY F. GITLIN RAPKIN, GITLIN & BEAUMONT21650 OXNARD ST STE 1620WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-7828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | textile fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |