USPTO serial 76679124
BIDET-IN-A-BOTTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2009
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIDET-IN-A-BOTTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CULVER CITY, CA
Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Pacific Palisades, CA
Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Pacific Palisades, CA
Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Pacific Palisades, CA
Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Fairbairn
DAVID R. FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGE, P.A.312 South 3rd StreetMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED FEMININE HYGIENE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CLEANSING AND SOOTHING CONCENTRATES, AND FEMININE HYGIENE KITS COMPRISED OF INDIVIDUAL PACKETS OF CLEANSING AND SOOTHING CONCENTRATES AND A DISPENSER FOR CONTAINING AND DISPENSING CLEANING AND SOOTHING SOLUTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 12, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWEETSPOT LABS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BIDET-IN-A-BOTTLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |