USPTO serial 76679281
RUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
JIN HWO YENG ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
EAST DISTRICT, TAICHUNG CITY, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Visserman
PETER VISSERMAN Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett333 Bridge Street, N.W.Bridgewater PlaceGrand Rapids, MI 49501-0352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Crankcases for components for motor cars other than for engines; automobile bumpers, gears for vehicles; land vehicle parts, namely, drive gears; reversing gears for land vehicles; connecting rods for land vehicles other than parts of motors and engines; air pumps of automobiles; vehicle parts, namely, shock absorbers; suspension systems for automobiles; automobile chassis; land vehicle engine rebuild kits, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |