USPTO serial 76679329
ENERGY RUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGY RUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Markva
NEIL F MARKVA3636 OSBORNE DRIVEWARRENTON, VA 20187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Powdered vitamin-enhanced energy dry drink mixes | ABANDONED | Feb 20, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |