USPTO serial 76679336
MCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4179589Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2012
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
Philip M. Weiss WEISS & WEISS410 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 105Jericho, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymer compositions applied to soil and used in conjunction with fertilizers to prevent runoff, leaching and loss; Polymer compositions sold as a component ingredient of fertilizers to prevent runoff, leaching and loss | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 30, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |