Drawing for SECUREX

USPTO serial 76679534

SECUREX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECUREX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned T. Himmelrich

NED T. HIMMELRICH Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-3332UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037SECURITY SYSTEM INTEGRATION SERVICES, NAMELY, INSTALLING SECURITY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, NAMELY, SECURITY SYSTEMS THAT ARE MONITORED; INSTALLING SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, FIRE ALERT AND INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS, INDUSTRIAL PROCESS SYSTEMS AND ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMSACTIVE—
042DESIGNING SECURITY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, NAMELY, SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, FIRE ALERT AND INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS, INDUSTRIAL PROCESS SYSTEMS AND ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMSACTIVE—
045MONITORING SECURITY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, NAMELY, SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, FIRE ALERT AND INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS, INDUSTRIAL PROCESS SYSTEMS AND ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMSINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 27, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 26, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance