USPTO serial 76679609
IPET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Korn
MARTIN KORN LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | animal activated metal pet doors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electronic animal confinement systems; electromagnetic signal transmitters for animal confinement and containment systems; electromagnetic signal receivers for animal confinement and containment systems; electronic animal training systems comprised of a transmitter and animal collar with attached receiver, which provides a method of stimulation or correction to animals; electronic animal tracking and locating devices; wireless outdoor pet containment system comprised of a transmitter, a receiver and markers that cause the transmission of a signal to the pet when the pet approaches a marker | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | animal collars with an attached electronic receiver; animal collars with an attached electronic transmitter; animal collars with electronic data storage and identification devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | animal activated non-metal pet doors | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | animal activated feeders and waters; wireless activated pet feeders and waters controlled by data provided via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | animal activated pet toys; wireless activated pet toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named IPET
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |