USPTO serial 76679654
PROPOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROPOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas V. Smurzynski
THOMAS V. SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD, LLP1 POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109-2127UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the design, operation, management and hosting of blogs and other interactive services on the Internet or other communication networks; software to enable uploading, downloading, publishing, editing, playing, streaming, viewing, blogging, sharing or otherwise provide film, video, audio, music, pictures, games, software and other multimedia content and information over the Internet or other communication networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Providing online forums, chat rooms, and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring information in the field of entertainment about audio recordings, music, art, and games; providing blogs featuring art, media, entertainment, personal experiences, information technology, and commercial enterprises; electronic publishing on the Internet or other communication networks of multimedia publications featuring text, graphics, music pictures, videos, games, software and other multimedia content and information | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Designing, hosting and managing websites for others on the Internet or other communication networks featuring blogs; providing a website that enables computer users to upload, download, publish, edit, play, stream, view, blog, share or otherwise provide film, video, audio, music, pictures, games, software and other multimedia content and information over the Internet or other communication networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fantasy Interactive, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fantasy Interactive, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROPOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |