Drawing for CATERAIR

USPTO serial 76680114

CATERAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWER, MARGARET
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATERAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 Elm Street, Suite 3000IP SECTIONDallas, TX 75201-4761

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Preparation for others of inventory reports on aircraft usageACTIVE—
037Sanitizing of in-flight food service carts; trash collection; janitorial services, namely, lavatory services; maintenance of aircraftACTIVE—
039In-flight services, namely, transporting catering supplies and service equipment to aircraftACTIVE—
043In-flight catering, namely, restocking food service cartsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 25, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 21, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 12, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 25, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 30, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 28, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 1, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance