USPTO serial 76680117
NEWPORT PLEASURE! FIRE IT UP!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEWPORT PLEASURE! FIRE IT UP!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard A. MacCord, Jr.
HOWARD A. MACCORD, JR. MACCORD MASON PLLCP.O. BOX 2974GREENSBORO, NC 27402-2974UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARETTES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 27, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |