USPTO serial 76680207
SAFEAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFEAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kendall C. Reed
KENDALL C. REED Monroe & Zinder, P.C.5933 W CENTURY BLVD STE 800LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-5455UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines and devices, and parts thereof, for generating, purifying, mixing, and dispensing of breathing gasses for use in pressurized portable containers for use in underwater environments, namely, ultra-pure gas filtration systems comprised of gas inlet and outlet valves, pressure regulating valves, humidity sensors and indicators, pressure sensors and indicators, gas filtering chambers, tubing, fittings, and hoses, gas blending panels comprised of gauges, valves, tubing, fittings, and hoses, pressure swing absorption systems comprised of chemical sieve beds, oxygen injection continuous blending systems comprised of mixing chambers, pressure regulators, flow meters, gauge valves, tubing fittings, and hoses, oxygen generating systems comprised of air intake valves, gas feeder lines, gas absorption chambers, check valves, tubing, fittings and hoses, portable final filter systems comprised of gas intake and outlet valves, pressure valves, gas filtering chambers, moisture separators, tubing, fittings, and hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | machines and devices, and parts thereof, for generating, purifying, mixing, and dispensing of breathing gases for use in pressurized portable containers for use in underwater environments, namely, oxygen analyzers not for medical purposes, helium analyzers not for medical purposes, oxygen sensors for measuring oxygen concentration, visual moisture indicators, portable gas containers in the nature cylinders for the storage and transportation of breathing gasses including air, helium, and nitrogen, analog gas pressure gauges, digital gas pressure gauges, electronic visual moisture indicators, back-pressure regulators for filtration systems, gas filtration cartridges for Self-Contained-Breathing-Apparatus and Self-Contained-Underwater-Breathing-Apparatus, unloader-valves, check-valves for outlets of breathing apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |