USPTO serial 76680214
BOD4GOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOD4GOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Markva
8322 TRAFORD LN # ASPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-1668UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded CDs dealing with information concerning aspects of Christian life that pertain to engaging a church, group or an organization to effect a competitive, corporate weight loss contest, and recognition and recognition and incentive awards program for excessively overweight individuals. The program has specified beginning and end time, and instructs the church, group, or organization how to form corporate exercise teams of participants that support individual team members in overcoming their obesity, and how to organize and operate details of each cycle of the program | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting lectures and workshops in the field of aspects of Christian life that pertain to engaging a church, group or an organization to effect a competitive, corporate weight loss contest, and recognition and incentive awards programs for excessively overweight individuals. The program has specified beginning and end time and instructs the church, group, or organization how to form corporate exercise teams of participants that support individual team members in overcoming their obesity, and how to organize and operate details of each cycle of the program, and distribution of course material connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |