USPTO serial 76680650
Serial No. 76680650
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76680650?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Panagiota Betty Tufariello
PANAGIOTA BETTY TUFARIELLO THE LAW OFFICES OF P.B. TUFARIELLO, P.C.25 Little Harbor RoadINTELLECTULAWMt. Sinai, NY 11766Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | NOTEBOOKS, LOOSE-LEAF BINDERS, SKETCH BOOKS, BLANK JOURNALS, MUSIC STAFF NOTEBOOKS, MULTIMEDIA SKETCHBOOKS FOR USE WITH CHARCOAL, PENCILS AND OIL PASTELS, ADDRESS BOOKS, WEEKLY PLANNERS, PERSONAL ORGANIZERS, PHOTOGRAPH ALBUMS, SCRAPBOOKS, GUEST BOOKS, AS WELL AS BOOK BINDING ELEMENTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |