Drawing for EDEN

USPTO serial 76680653

EDEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Cislo

DANIEL M. CISLO CISLO & THOMAS, LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020High-end, highly ornamented dresses, dresser mirrors, chests with drawers, armoires, nightstands, dining room tables, dining room chairs, sideboards, sideboard mirrors, cocktail tables, end tables, barrel end tables, console tables, curios, sofas, high back chairs, chairs-and-a-half, arms benches, and ottoman, made primarily from hand-carved wood; and, bed head boards, bed footboards, bed rail, bed slats made primarily from hand-carved wood for beds other than bunk bedsACTIVEOct 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 25, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 25, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 11, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 10, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 10, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 14, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 12, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance